Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0253434, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1290917

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Descriptive analyses of 2009-2016 were performed using the data of the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) which covers nearly 70 percent of the Thai population. The analyses described the time and geographical trends of nationwide admission rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular diseases, retinopathy, cataract, and diabetic foot amputation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The database of T2DM patients aged 15-100 years who were admitted between 2009 and 2016 under the UCS and that of the UCS population were retrieved for the analyses. The admitted cases of T2DM were extracted from the database using disease codes of principal and secondary diagnoses defined by the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th Revisions. The T2DM admission rates in 2009-2016 were the number of admissions divided by the number of the UCS population. The standardized admission rates (SARs)were further estimated in contrast to the expected number of admissions considering age and sex composition of the UCS population in each region. A linearly increased trend was found in T2DM admission rates from 2009 to 2016. Female admission rates were persistently higher than that of males. In 2016, an increase in the T2DM admission rates was observed among the older ages relative to that in 2009. Although the SARs of T2DM were generally higher in Bangkok and central regions in 2009, except that with CKD and foot amputation which had higher trends in northeastern regions, the geographical inequalities were fairly reduced by 2016. CONCLUSION: Admission rates of T2DM and its major complications increased in Thailand from 2009 to 2016. Although the overall geographical inequalities in the SARs of T2DM were reduced in the country, further efforts are required to improve the health system and policies focusing on risk factors and regions to manage the increasing T2DM.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Catarata/complicaciones , Catarata/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etiología , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Retinopatía Diabética/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Tailandia , Adulto Joven
2.
Saudi Med J ; 42(2): 166-169, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1076930

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To avoid hospital spread of Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) and to analyze out of hospital outcomes after amputation. METHODS: Prospective analysis of data obtained from 60 diabetic patients in 2020 was performed at Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Personal protection equipment included double surgical mask, glasses, disposable surgical coats, and surgical masks for patients. Swabs were used to take samples from wounds. We randomly divided patients in 2 groups of 30 patients each. In pre-operative treatment, we used local anesthesia lidocaine hydrochloride 2% (Belupo, Koprivnica, Croatia) in group A and systemic analgesia intravenous tramadol chloride 100 mg intravenous (Krka, Novo Mesto, Slovenia) in group B. Wounds were surgically treated each day and heal spontaneously. Periodical control exams were performed. RESULTS: Wound healing did not present any statistically significant differences between groups (group A: 69±21.97 and B: 61±22.13 days, t=-1.22; p=0.11). No statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between groups A and B in wound healing regarding to gender or cigarette use was noted. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in amputation treatment between the 2 comparative groups were noted. No confirmed COVID-19 infections in medical staff who performed surgical interventions or in treated patients were detected.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , COVID-19/prevención & control , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Bosnia y Herzegovina/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/instrumentación , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Masculino , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas
3.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 165: 108245, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-457266

RESUMEN

AIM: To define the outcomes of persons with diabetes and foot ulcers (DFUs) managed through a specific triage pathway during the COVID-19 crisis. METHODS: Patients who had an active DFU during the COVID-19 emergency were included. All participants were managed using a specific triage system driven both by ulcer'severity and concomitant co-diseases. Subjects with severely complicated DFUs were urgently referred to hospital regardless of the concomitant comorbidities. Subjects with complicated DFUs received outpatient evaluation (within 48-72 h) and were admitted to hospital if required (revascularization, surgical intervention, intravenous antibiotic therapy); after the first outpatient visit or hospitalization, patients were followed according to the number of comorbidities (in the case of 3 or more comorbidities patients were followed up by telemedicine). Patients with uncomplicated DFUs were managed by telemedicine after outpatient evaluation. Healing, major amputation, death and rate of COVID-19 infection were evaluated. The minimum follow-up was 1 month. RESULTS: The study group included 151 patients. The mean age was 69.9 ± 14.2 years, 58.9% were male and 91.4% had type 2 diabetes; 58.7% had severely complicated, 21% complicated and 20.3% uncomplicated DFUs. Among those, 78.8% presented with 3 or more comorbidities. One hundred and six patients had regular clinical follow-ups, while 45 were managed through telemedicine. Forty-one (27.1%) patients healed, 3 (1.9%) had major amputations and 3 (1.9%) died. One patient (0.6%) reported COVID-19 positivity due to infection acquired at home. CONCLUSION: The triage pathway adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic showed adequate management of DFUs and no cases of hospital virus exposure.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/terapia , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Triaje/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas
4.
J Diabetes Complications ; 34(9): 107622, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-260050

RESUMEN

Diabetic foot ulcers are among the most serious complications of diabetes. If left untreated, these ulcers can lead to severe infection and gangrene; in some instances, they may result in death. Thus, timely treatment of diabetic foot ulcers is extremely important. However, timely patient treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic is particularly challenging, because of the higher volume of patients and the need to ensure safety of medical personnel. This article describes a proposed strategy for diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, based on experiences with infection and control strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/terapia , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , COVID-19 , China , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA